[Nitro] A Facets Namespace?
george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Fri Jun 2 12:19:58 EDT 2006
I would suggest going the Glue way, ie use a namespace (Facets) but
include in the default namespace ;-)
On 6/2/06, TRANS <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> Should all Facets' classes and modules be wrapped in a Facets namespace?
> I've considered but haven't gone that route fro a few reasons.
> 1) Some modules seem so basic as to be fitting the toplevel.
> 2) Some facets create extensions to core/standard. Does it make sense
> to encapsulate classes/modules in a "brand" namespaces when aspects of
> them effect other toplevel modules and classes?
> 3) I have a working model of requiring into. That method is currently
> defined in roll.rb but I can add it to Facets. The question is, is it
> robust enough?
> Other considerations?
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
More information about the Nitro-general