transfire at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 16:58:15 EDT 2006
On 4/4/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/4/06, TRANS <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4/3/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hmm... That's a thought. Why not just store the properties as
> > > > annotations? The prop_* methods and property could just be interfaces
> > > > to the annotation system. I wonder if that would work...
> > >
> > > It does actually. Except it also creates the attribute (Seems kind of
> > > a waste not to since the information is there), and of course it does
> > > that enchanting thing.
> > It does? Hmm... I must be missing something...
> I see. It uses both annotations *and* properties for storage. I meant
> just using annotations.
I agree. That would be nice.
> Final outcome: Matz^H^H^H^HGeorge is open to renaming, but doesn't
> like any of the suggestions so far. Ever get that weird deja vu
More information about the Nitro-general