bryan.a.soto at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 16:39:48 EDT 2006
On 4/4/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/4/06, TRANS <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/3/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hmm... That's a thought. Why not just store the properties as
> > > annotations? The prop_* methods and property could just be interfaces
> > > to the annotation system. I wonder if that would work...
> > It does actually. Except it also creates the attribute (Seems kind of
> > a waste not to since the information is there), and of course it does
> > that enchanting thing.
> It does? Hmm... I must be missing something...
I see. It uses both annotations *and* properties for storage. I meant
just using annotations. Anyway, this thread has gotten really long and
doesn't seem to have accomplished anything. I guess we'll leave the
ticket open for now and log the suggestions we have received so far.
Final outcome: Matz^H^H^H^HGeorge is open to renaming, but doesn't
like any of the suggestions so far. Ever get that weird deja vu
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they
will surprise you with their ingenuity." —General George S. Patton
More information about the Nitro-general