transfire at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 13:04:56 EDT 2006
On 4/4/06, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ah.. another reason modified but backward compatible #attr methods are
> > a safe bet.
> I always wanted to convert to attr_ methods instead of prop, but am
> not really sure if this is possible... Will investigate this again...
I know you can do it as long as they are passive. I.e. just adding in
the extra annotation call. Right now I suspect #poperty is too
dynamically active --though it may still be possible.
More information about the Nitro-general