transfire at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 17:11:24 EDT 2006
On 4/3/06, Bryan Soto <bryan.a.soto at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/3/06, TRANS <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ah.. another reason modified but backward compatible #attr methods are
> > a safe bet.
> Yes, the Ruby community is very open to modifying core methods, don't
> you think? ;)
If it's "backward compatible" what's the difference?
I don't really mind either way, I'm just saying.
More information about the Nitro-general