george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Mon Dec 26 05:49:37 EST 2005
> intuitive. Perhaps evn better, would a mixin, or a superclass, be more
> appropriate here? Eg.
perhaps we can improve the name.
> Also, what's the reason for the field names to be prefixed by 'og'?
this is configurable. I originally added the prefix because different
rdbms have different reserved names, for example i think Oracle
reserves 'name'. so if you used
property :name without prefix you would have a problem.
(perhaps you could use "name" instead of ogname, but I am not sure.)
More information about the Nitro-general