[Nitro] AOP with nitro

PAUL HANCHETT paulha at aracnet.com
Tue Apr 12 16:39:01 EDT 2005


I bow to my elders!  :-)

George Moschovitis wrote:

>I tend to agree with James. I think using .xhtml as the extension was
>a bit unfortunate.
>On the positive side, we can still change this to something more neutral :)
>
>-g.
>
>On Apr 12, 2005 8:51 PM, James Britt <james_b at neurogami.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>PAUL HANCHETT wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>   Exactly.  Most template based generation is like that, right?  I'll
>>>vote for xhtml then.  :-)
>>>      
>>>
>>I'll leave it to you, then, to explain to the puzzled (such as myself)
>>why the .xhtml source files are not XHTML, nor do they result in XHTML,
>>and appear to have no actual relation to XHTML.
>>
>>Most general-purpose templating systems use a neutral file extension
>>(e.g. .PHP, .ASP), intended to identify the processing application
>>rather than than any arbitrary output format.
>>
>>James
>>_______________________________________________
>>Nitro-general mailing list
>>Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
>>http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20050412/1782a72f/attachment.html 


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list