[Nitro] AOP with nitro
paulha at aracnet.com
Tue Apr 12 16:39:01 EDT 2005
I bow to my elders! :-)
George Moschovitis wrote:
>I tend to agree with James. I think using .xhtml as the extension was
>a bit unfortunate.
>On the positive side, we can still change this to something more neutral :)
>On Apr 12, 2005 8:51 PM, James Britt <james_b at neurogami.com> wrote:
>>PAUL HANCHETT wrote:
>>> Exactly. Most template based generation is like that, right? I'll
>>>vote for xhtml then. :-)
>>I'll leave it to you, then, to explain to the puzzled (such as myself)
>>why the .xhtml source files are not XHTML, nor do they result in XHTML,
>>and appear to have no actual relation to XHTML.
>>Most general-purpose templating systems use a neutral file extension
>>(e.g. .PHP, .ASP), intended to identify the processing application
>>rather than than any arbitrary output format.
>>Nitro-general mailing list
>>Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nitro-general