[Nitro] AOP with nitro
george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 14:51:12 EDT 2005
I tend to agree with James. I think using .xhtml as the extension was
a bit unfortunate.
On the positive side, we can still change this to something more neutral :)
On Apr 12, 2005 8:51 PM, James Britt <james_b at neurogami.com> wrote:
> PAUL HANCHETT wrote:
> > Exactly. Most template based generation is like that, right? I'll
> > vote for xhtml then. :-)
> I'll leave it to you, then, to explain to the puzzled (such as myself)
> why the .xhtml source files are not XHTML, nor do they result in XHTML,
> and appear to have no actual relation to XHTML.
> Most general-purpose templating systems use a neutral file extension
> (e.g. .PHP, .ASP), intended to identify the processing application
> rather than than any arbitrary output format.
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
More information about the Nitro-general