[Nitro] AOP with nitro

George Moschovitis george.moschovitis at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 14:51:12 EDT 2005

I tend to agree with James. I think using .xhtml as the extension was
a bit unfortunate.
On the positive side, we can still change this to something more neutral :)


On Apr 12, 2005 8:51 PM, James Britt <james_b at neurogami.com> wrote:
> >    Exactly.  Most template based generation is like that, right?  I'll
> > vote for xhtml then.  :-)
> I'll leave it to you, then, to explain to the puzzled (such as myself)
> why the .xhtml source files are not XHTML, nor do they result in XHTML,
> and appear to have no actual relation to XHTML.
> Most general-purpose templating systems use a neutral file extension
> (e.g. .PHP, .ASP), intended to identify the processing application
> rather than than any arbitrary output format.
> James
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general


More information about the Nitro-general mailing list