[Nitro] AOP with nitro

[PAUL HANCHETT]

Exactly.  Most template based generation is like that, right?  I'll vote 
for xhtml then.  :-)

James Britt wrote:

> PAUL HANCHETT wrote:
>
>>    Oh, you mean there's no requirement that the files for Nitro be 
>> xhtml...  I see.  But the expectation is that processing the file 
>> will result in an html document, right?  When I saw xhtml I knew I 
>> was looking at an XML style document that should result in html for 
>> viewing.
>>
>> I don't think I'd be too quick to abandon that unless there is some 
>> *misleading* understanding it creates...
>
>
>
> There is no assurance that what you'll get is (X)HTML; it all depends 
> on what you happen to put in the template.  There is no actual 
> connection to XHTML or HTML, really; it's just text templating.
>
> James
> _______________________________________________
> Nitro-general mailing list
> Nitro-general at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/nitro-general/attachments/20050412/813511c0/attachment.html