New filtering in MouseHole

[Kevin Ballard]

That's actually a really good idea. It could take a single argument - 
a regex matches against the whole URL, a string gets compared to the  
URL (as opposed to translating it to a regex), and a hash gets  
compared to the URL components.

I'll work on that now, and post a revised patch that makes those  
changes (as well as reverts filter back to rewrite and turns my new  
rewrite to register_url).

On Sep 4, 2005, at 5:26 PM, why the lucky stiff wrote:

> Well, it's consistent with include_match and exclude_match.  I want  
> all URL matching schemes to be identical.
>
> So, let's say down the road I entertain an idea for per-part matching:
>
>  include_match :scheme => "file"
>  include_match :scheme => /https?/
>  include_match :domain => /google\.com$/, :path => "user.js"
>  exclude_match :scheme => "http", :domain => /boingboing/
>
> If I add that, I want it to be consistent for exclude_match and  
> register_url as well.  Consistency and ease of remembering  
> MouseHole's API is paramount.

-- 
Kevin Ballard
kevin at sb.org
http://www.tildesoft.com
http://kevin.sb.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2378 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mousehole-scripters/attachments/20050904/5cb5d9f9/smime-0001.bin