From luislavena at gmail.com  Sat Aug  1 23:08:59 2009
From: luislavena at gmail.com (Luis Lavena)
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 00:08:59 -0300
Subject: [Mongrel] mongrel_service on Win2003
In-Reply-To: <82abf2570907290903p1bf514aalef6da4b36bbcaaf3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <82abf2570907270738n783a6b51v8e46dc8c9b7530d1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<71166b3b0907270911y7be66394tf4170d3a7572ee76@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A6DFE70.6050309@gmail.com>
	<71166b3b0907271443l77cda66dweae735d279f0d881@mail.gmail.com> 
	<82abf2570907280132l5d68751au5f7a948c2c5cde93@mail.gmail.com> 
	<82abf2570907290903p1bf514aalef6da4b36bbcaaf3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71166b3b0908012008g10af62a0g3127f4160cd13e64@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Darren Syzling<dsyzling at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/7/28 Darren Syzling <dsyzling at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Clearly I'm missing something and mongrel_service is encountering some
>> lack of permission since as I said adding the service account to the
>> administrators group the app works fine.
>>
>> Is our server tied down - yes could be pretty tightly, ipsec rules
>> etc. It does have Kaspersky. I may have to grab the code for
>> mongrel_service and attempt to instrument it to see how far it gets.
>>
>> Unless there's any further debugging steps I can try?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Darren
>>
>
> After posting yesterday I also came across this thread which looks
> very similar to the situation I'm encountering:
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/155315. I wonder if this was issue was
> resolved?
>

I believe it was.

Can you check and supply the output of servicefb.log?

Apologize for the detail but work has been hectic lately.
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exup?ry

From dsyzling at gmail.com  Sun Aug  2 16:11:09 2009
From: dsyzling at gmail.com (Darren Syzling)
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100
Subject: [Mongrel] mongrel_service on Win2003
In-Reply-To: <71166b3b0908012008g10af62a0g3127f4160cd13e64@mail.gmail.com>
References: <82abf2570907270738n783a6b51v8e46dc8c9b7530d1@mail.gmail.com>
	<71166b3b0907270911y7be66394tf4170d3a7572ee76@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A6DFE70.6050309@gmail.com>	<71166b3b0907271443l77cda66dweae735d279f0d881@mail.gmail.com>
	<82abf2570907280132l5d68751au5f7a948c2c5cde93@mail.gmail.com>
	<82abf2570907290903p1bf514aalef6da4b36bbcaaf3@mail.gmail.com>
	<71166b3b0908012008g10af62a0g3127f4160cd13e64@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A75F2DD.7090000@gmail.com>

Luis Lavena wrote:
> I believe it was.
>
> Can you check and supply the output of servicefb.log?
>
>   
I'm not sure 0.3.4 which I'm running logs messages to this log, the 
thread quoted claimed you had to drop back to 0.3.3? When I experience 
this issue I don't get any log written at all.
> Apologize for the detail but work has been hectic lately.
>   
No problem, in the meantime I pulled the code myself and simply set the 
default RunCode to be RunAsService if it couldn't detect the run 
context, as opposed to RunAsUnknown. This at least cured the problem and 
allowed me to start the service as a non admin account. So specifically 
what I mean is:

--- ServiceFB_Utils.bas    (revision 1037)
+++ ServiceFB_Utils.bas    (working copy)
@@ -112,7 +112,11 @@
             else
                 '# ok, the first paramenter in the commandline didn't work,
                 '# report back so we could send the banner!
-                result = RunAsUnknown
+        '# DS Fix - OpenProcess on a parent to check for services.exe 
name does not work
+        '# when using a non admin account, so here we assume that the 
user wants to run
+        '# as a last ditch attempt to decide the mode we run in.
+                '#result = RunAsUnknown
+        result = RunAsService
             end if
         end if
        
This was only a local hack to get it up and running on my side. I didn't 
debug too much further but presume OpenProcess on the parent is a 
privileged operation - so the check to see if the parent is 
'services.exe' fails and then it can't detect the runmode. If you want 
me to absolutely confirm this I can.

Let me know how you want to move forward.

Regards
Darren

From lists at ruby-forum.com  Tue Aug 18 15:18:02 2009
From: lists at ruby-forum.com (Tiberiu Motoc)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:18:02 +0200
Subject: [Mongrel] Mongrel service keeps re-starting ruby
In-Reply-To: <4A4384D3.3030204@jhu.edu>
References: <F824CBA49329DB44A844ABFE6E9B7F23054A3DC097@exch1-p>
	<71166b3b0906250519y68c00193l8c47e9e136b70809@mail.gmail.com>
	<F824CBA49329DB44A844ABFE6E9B7F23054A3DC198@exch1-p>
	<4A4384D3.3030204@jhu.edu>
Message-ID: <f37489938ac74fbdfbd55a5651dccad6@ruby-forum.com>

It sure helped me.

Thanks,
Tiberiu
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

From bornboulder77 at gmail.com  Fri Aug 21 14:09:58 2009
From: bornboulder77 at gmail.com (Bjorn Boulder)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:09:58 -0700
Subject: [Mongrel] Mongrel and mimetype?
Message-ID: <a6591d550908211109kda1fcafla22b889db5352319@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Mongrel People,

lighttpd allows me to assign a mimetype to a file which ends with a
specific suffix.

For example if I have a file named, "helloworld.manifest", and I serve
it using lighttpd,
I can declare its mimetype with the following declaration in lighttpd.conf:

mimetype.assign = (
  ".manifest"   =>  "text/cache-manifest",
  ".css"        =>  "text/css",
  ".gif"        =>  "image/gif",
  ".htm"        =>  "text/html",
  ".html"       =>  "text/html",
  ".jpeg"       =>  "image/jpeg",
  ".jpg"        =>  "image/jpeg",
  ".js"         =>  "text/javascript",
  ".png"        =>  "image/png",
  ".swf"        =>  "application/x-shockwave-flash",
  ".txt"        =>  "text/plain"
)

With Mongrel, how do I declare the mimetype of "helloworld.manifest" ?

-moi

From bornboulder77 at gmail.com  Fri Aug 21 15:35:20 2009
From: bornboulder77 at gmail.com (Bjorn Boulder)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:35:20 -0700
Subject: [Mongrel] Mongrel and mimetype?
In-Reply-To: <a6591d550908211109kda1fcafla22b889db5352319@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a6591d550908211109kda1fcafla22b889db5352319@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a6591d550908211235i2e0f6c98yaa7d8ca01acea374@mail.gmail.com>

Easy answer:

Read this:
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/wiki/HOWTO

Write that:
---
  .manifest: text/cache-manifest
  .css: text/css
  .gif: image/gif
  .htm: text/html
  .html: text/html
  .jpeg: image/jpeg
  .jpg: image/jpeg
  .js: text/javascript
  .png: image/png
  .swf: application/x-shockwave-flash
  .txt: text/plain

Run this:
  cd rails_root
  mongrel_rails start -m config/mime.yaml

-b


On 8/21/09, Bjorn Boulder <bornboulder77 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mongrel People,
>
> lighttpd allows me to assign a mimetype to a file which ends with a
> specific suffix.
>
> For example if I have a file named, "helloworld.manifest", and I serve
> it using lighttpd,
> I can declare its mimetype with the following declaration in lighttpd.conf:
>
> mimetype.assign = (
>   ".manifest"   =>  "text/cache-manifest",
>   ".css"        =>  "text/css",
>   ".gif"        =>  "image/gif",
>   ".htm"        =>  "text/html",
>   ".html"       =>  "text/html",
>   ".jpeg"       =>  "image/jpeg",
>   ".jpg"        =>  "image/jpeg",
>   ".js"         =>  "text/javascript",
>   ".png"        =>  "image/png",
>   ".swf"        =>  "application/x-shockwave-flash",
>   ".txt"        =>  "text/plain"
> )
>
> With Mongrel, how do I declare the mimetype of "helloworld.manifest" ?
>
> -moi
>