[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging

Corey Jewett ml at syntheticplayground.com
Thu Oct 4 02:37:12 EDT 2007

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:52:20 +0200, Chris Taggart wrote:
> That's possibly a leak, but I'm still a bit confused as to why the 
> 64-bit server is using so much more... and whether I should maybe run 
> the mongrel_cluster instances on 32-bit kernel (assuming that's 
> possible).

On the Java side of the world I have an app that consumes 40% more memory running on 64-bit over 32-bit. This is under 64-bit linux. Our JVMs average around 5G so 32-bit kernels aren't really an option. (32-bit Java has a 2G per jvm cap).


More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list