[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging

Roger Pack lists at ruby-forum.com
Wed Oct 3 16:32:43 EDT 2007

> The problem isn't 120M -- but that it seems to keep climbing until much 
> instability ensues...
> That's possibly a leak, but I'm still a bit confused as to why the 
> 64-bit server is using so much more... and whether I should maybe run 
> the mongrel_cluster instances on 32-bit kernel (assuming that's 
> possible).

Could try googl'ing for ruby memory profiler
and possibly (if desperate) running ruby with valgrind.
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list