[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging

Zed A. Shaw zedshaw at zedshaw.com
Wed Oct 3 11:59:52 EDT 2007

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:12:01 +0200
Chris Taggart <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> Update on what I've tried/found out so far.
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pHDcT1cywdrovBLlL7QV8Ow

What's funny is I've been stuggling with JRuby Rails applications running under *any* application server requring 2G (yes gigabytes) of RAM just to function.  Many times we'd have to do complete restarts about 1 or 2 times a week.

So it's strange to hear someone say that 120M is too much. :-)

Zed A. Shaw
- Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/
- Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/
- Evil: http://yearofevil.com/

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list