[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging. Any ideas why?

Alexey Verkhovsky alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 16:39:07 EDT 2007

On 10/2/07, Evan Weaver <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
> I really doubt the pointers are giving you 120% more memory usage.
> Overhead from switching from 32bit to 64bit addressing is usually
> about 15%.

Usually, yes. And yet RSS of a Mongrel process running a skeleton
Rails app is ~20 Mb on i386 and ~32 Mb on x86_64.

Alexey Verkhovsky
CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list