[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging
lists at ruby-forum.com
Tue Oct 2 15:23:18 EDT 2007
Wayne E. Seguin wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Chris T <ctmailinglists at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> One the staging server, even when I'm hammering it with a benchmarking
>> (actually a Pentium 4 I had lying around). However the ruby libraries
>> #ruby -v
>> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i486-linux]
> I have not personally encountered this issue, however I also do not use
> apt-get to install anything in the Ruby application stack. I compile
> everything by hand. I'd recommend trying that next (compile-install Ruby
> RubyGems) on the production server.
> Most production servers I work with are also 64 bit Linux boxes and as I
> said, I compile everything and haven't seen this issue.
> I hope that this helps,
I may try that -- set up a test instance same as other ones but with
Ruby compiled by hand. Did it once before and seem to remember it wasn't
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
More information about the Mongrel-users