[Mongrel] Mongrel using way more memory on production than staging. Any ideas why?
ctmailinglists at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 2 06:31:30 EDT 2007
Johan Sørensen wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Chris T wrote:
>> The staging server (also split with Xen) is set up pretty much
>> On the production box, pretty much immediately (and I'm talking about
>> within one or two requests), the mongrels climb up to about 150-160MB.
>> One the staging server, even when I'm hammering it with a benchmarking
>> suite (have tried with httperf, and bench and crawl) the mongrels sit
>> comfortably at about 60MB each.
> Same box, hardware+kernel wise (32 vs 64 bit)? Libraries built the
> same way?
No, the production box is Athlon64 X2 3800, the staging one i386
(actually a Pentium 4 I had lying around). However the ruby libraries
were built the same way:
sudo apt-get install ruby1.8 libzlib-ruby rdoc irb ruby1.8-dev
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [x86_64-linux]
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i486-linux]
Autopendium :: Stuff about old cars
More information about the Mongrel-users