[Mongrel] Mongrel and Camping
evan at cloudbur.st
Sun Nov 11 01:55:26 EST 2007
A good question. Originally most people used Camping with ActiveRecord
in its default non-concurrent mode, so that's probably why. It should
perhaps be removed.
Or is there some interaction problem with the Camping reloader?
On Nov 11, 2007 12:54 AM, Zach Moazeni <zach.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is the camping handler using Mutex#synchronize to serve requests?
> I was under the impression that camping was considered more thread
> safe than Rails?
> Mongrel-users mailing list
> Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the Mongrel-users