[Mongrel] can't configure mongrel_cluster to start on boot
david at vrensk.com
Wed Nov 7 17:48:20 EST 2007
On Nov 7, 2007 9:13 PM, Tiberiu Motoc <tiberiu.motoc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
> Thanks for all your help. It now makes sense how it all works.
Hi Tiberiu, thanks, I'm glad to hear that!
> Unfortunately for me it doesn't work and I don't think it is because
> of mongrel_cluster.
> After you mentioned that I should have a symbolic link to
> mongrel_cluster_ctl in /usr/bin,
Oops, did I say that? I meant to say that the actual script
'mongrel_cluster_ctl' should reside in /usr/bin. But I have to admit that
that was a simplification; the script should reside in the same directory as
the 'ruby' binary.
I realized that maybe the whole Ruby environment is not available at boot
> time. I installed Ruby in a shared location, but there are not symbolic
> links in /usr/bin to any of the Ruby utilities.
Well, there needn't be. You can have you entire ruby installation in
/usr/local or /what/ever, as long as you put /usr/local/bin or
/what/ever/bin in your path. Where is that shared location? How do you
access it? The reason I ask is that mongrel_cluster normally starts after
all network services have been started. A typical FC6 box would have this
(and more) in /etc/rc3.d:
S10network (starts the network interface)
S25netfs (mounts remote shares)
S28autofs (starts the automounter)
S60nfs (starts nfs sharing)
And since the scripts are run in this order, remote shares should be
To test this, I created a small Ruby script which write "TEST" to a file in
> /tmp; I call this script from a bash script which I put in the /etc/init.d
> directory and which I configured using /sbin/chkconfig (similar to the setup
> of mongrel_cluster). Guess what?! No file is created in the /tmp directory
> at boot time.
Just to check: if you put
echo TEST > /tmp/my_test_script_runs
in the bash script, does that work as expected? And second, do you call the
ruby script as a command or a script, i.e., do you say
And finally, what does the script look like?
So now my question becomes: what is the proper way of installing Ruby on a
> Linux machine? I did create a symbolic link to "ruby" in /usr/bin, but I
> don't think that's enough. What other symbolic links do I need?
You don't need any symbolic links as long as the bin directory is in your
path. If you compile it on your own, it's quite common to put it /usr/local
since that is what 'configure' does by default.
The 'proper' way is a matter of taste. If you enjoy being an admin, go
ahead and install everything from source and put it in /usr/local. If you
don't, use your distro's package manager (yum, dep, apt, rpm, what have you)
and let it put things in /usr. Arguing about which is best borders on
I still don't have a solution for you, but keep talking!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mongrel-users