[Mongrel] Mongrel and memory usage
alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 10:55:34 EST 2007
On 11/5/07, Kirk Haines <wyhaines at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Thomas Balthazar <thomas.tmp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint decrease.
> > Is it normal?
> Ruby is a garbage collected language. Ruby has a conservative mark
> and sweep garbage collector.
But Ruby processes never release memory back to the operating system.
So, the fact that its RSS never goes down is normal.
In normal circumstances, Mongrel should grow up to some point around
60-120 Mb and stay there. 300 Mb and growing is a sure sign you have a
memory leak somewhere.
More information about the Mongrel-users