[Mongrel] [ANN] Another mongrel_cluster prerelease

Zed A. Shaw zedshaw at zedshaw.com
Thu Apr 12 17:35:09 EDT 2007

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:35:06 -0700
"Michael A. Schoen" <schoenm at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Bradley Taylor wrote:
> > mongrel_rails stop accepts a --wait argument. If I add that to 
> > mongrel_cluster, will it solve these issues?
> Not for me I don't think. Again, I may be misreading it, but that --wait 
> argument just looks like it literally waits, then does a hard kill. I 
> would have expected that option to send a TERM, then wait up to @wait 
> seconds for it to go away, and do a KILL if it was still there. If that 
> were the implementation it sounds like it would work for most folks.


Try running:

killall -USR2 mongrel_rails

and see if that works the way you expect it to work.  That's the signal
to tell Mongrel to do a stop/wait/start process (the real restart).

Next version of mongrel_cluster will just do this.

Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu
http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321483502 -- The Mongrel Book

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list