[Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 0.3.17 PR -- Big Work Day, 1.0 RC1 Very Close

Will Green will at hotgazpacho.com
Sat Nov 25 14:01:02 EST 2006

128, 512, and 1024 Processors (hardware)?  Do you perhaps mean processes 

You either have some serious SERIOUS Enterprisey Hardware, or you're 
spawning an (IMHO) ridiculous number of Mongrels...

Jacob Atzen wrote:
> Hello Zed,
> Just wanted to let you know that from the testing I've done this release
> seems to be very stable on my setup. So far I have been unable to crash
> mongrel when using 512 or 128 processors. I'm still experiencing lockups
> with 1024 processors though. Additionally it seems something is
> still leaking memory when threads get killed. I am seeing processes
> eating up to ~95MB with 512 processors and ~170MB with 1024. It does
> seem to only grow to somewhere around these sizes and then it stops
> leaking. Unfortunately the memory is not freed again as far as I can
> tell. But keeping the number of processors low will also keep the memory
> usage acceptable.
> Anyways, I'm really excited to have a stable mongrel, so thank you very
> much!

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list