[Mongrel] Error : No protocol handler was valid for the URL...

Zed A. Shaw zedshaw at zedshaw.com
Fri Dec 29 20:47:53 EST 2006

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:12:13 -0800
"Eden Li" <eden.li at gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but is there an updated
> comparison of all the different mongrel implementation methods out
> there?
> I've been on lighty+pen+mongrel for awhile and I don't really see a
> compelling to switch to nginx... unless someone else has experience
> with both and can elaborate on the goodness of nginx vs lighty/pen...

Well, nginx would be one component less than your current combo, and has a equally simple configuration.  Unless you have a lighty specific component the lowered complexity would be a main motive.  nginx also supports fcgi.

Otherwise, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu
http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321483502 -- The Mongrel Book
http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help.

More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list