[Mongrel] [SURVEY] MIME types questions for Mongrel 1.0 RC1
jeroen at supercool.nl
Thu Dec 7 02:13:03 EST 2006
David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
>> So, let's put this to the test:
>> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
> I'm strongly in favor of this. Especially for core defaults like xml,
> atom, and rss. It would mean that Rails page caching would Just Work
> even for these common caching types.
Could you explain this? Mongrel is very unlikely to serve cached pages.
That's usually handled by apache/lighty. I ran into this the other day
and had to adjust my apache rewrite rules to look for cached .xml files
rather than just .html files.
More information about the Mongrel-users