[Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Pre-Release -- Ruby's LEAK Fixed (Death To Mutex!)
luislavena at gmail.com
Sun Aug 27 05:56:27 EDT 2006
On 8/27/06, Zed Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 20:26 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote:
> > I have done some testings of the code on Win32 with ruby 1.8.4, please
> > check the included pictures .
> Thank you Luis, *this* is what I need. A test with Mongrel code and
> evidence that it's not fixed on a particular platform. Thank you for
> not guessing at random theories about why it works this way, and instead
> doing the test.
> It's also incredibly sad since it means that one way works on POSIX and
> the other works on Win32.
Yeah, I was shocked when I saw that.
> I'll take a look at this tomorrow and see what happens.
What about a new approach to RailsHandler? I mean:
If just 1 thread can access Rails dispatcher, what if we
serialize/enqueue the requests?
Maybe will be too complicated, but MonitorMixin maybe could help:
Anyway, talk this sunday about mongrel_service
Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort,
which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that
More information about the Mongrel-users