[Mongrel] Mongrel processes

Dave Murphy schwuk at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 09:25:50 EDT 2006


On 03/08/06, Jens Kraemer <kraemer at webit.de> wrote:
> I don't think there's any difference in terms of memory consumption,
> imho it's just a difference in how ps shows processes / threads. I
> remember that back in my old Java days on some systems (2.4 kernels) ps
> showed each single Java thread, that behaviour disappeared with 2.6
> kernels - then ps showed only one process per running application,
> regardless of any threads it has spawned.

I suspected it was threads rather than processes, but I wanted to confirm it.

Cheers,
-- 
Dave Murphy (Schwuk)
http://schwuk.com


More information about the Mongrel-users mailing list