Unicorn on shared apps platform

Amol Dev devamol at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 26 18:18:30 UTC 2013


> unicorn isn't for cases where
> you're cramming many apps on one box and trying to squeak by on memory
> usage.


Thanks. The discussion helped a lot.


----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net>
> To: unicorn list <mongrel-unicorn at rubyforge.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Unicorn on shared apps platform
> 
> Hongli Lai <hongli at phusion.nl> wrote:
>>  On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Amol Dev <devamol at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>  > We are hosting multiple Rails applications on same server and using
>>  > Passenger + Apache. I can see Unicorn be useful for seamless
>>  > deploys, few questions running it on Rails platform with 50+ rails
>>  > apps:
> 
>>  Rainbows! is designed for a reverse proxy setup
> 
> That's not true, Rainbows! was designed to serve clients directly.
> On the other hand, I do not know if anybody uses Rainbows! that way
> (or at all in production).
> 
> Anyways everything else is accurate.  unicorn isn't for cases where
> you're cramming many apps on one box and trying to squeak by on memory
> usage.
> _______________________________________________
> Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn
> Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
> 


More information about the mongrel-unicorn mailing list