HTTP streaming and Unicorn timeout
normalperson at yhbt.net
Thu Aug 22 17:04:50 UTC 2013
Nokan Emiro <uzleepito at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer Eric.
> > Using Rack::Timeout with Rainbows! instead of unicorn is probably a
> > better idea.
> 99% of the requests are fast and can be served far below 300 ms. Only
> a few type of requests need to stream lots of data. Do you really think that
> unicorn isn't a good choice in this case and I should consider switching to
> something else (Rack::Timeout + Rainbows!, Puma or whatever) just for the
> sake of that 1%?
What Hongli said. unicorn is only for sending fast responses. You'll
run into scalability problems very quickly if unicorn is used for any
More information about the mongrel-unicorn