HTTP streaming and Unicorn timeout

Nokan Emiro uzleepito at
Thu Aug 22 15:26:30 UTC 2013

Thank you for your answer Eric.

> Using Rack::Timeout with Rainbows! instead of unicorn is probably a
> better idea.

99% of the requests are fast and can be served far below 300 ms.  Only
a few type of requests need to stream lots of data.  Do you really think that
unicorn isn't a good choice in this case and I should consider switching to
something else (Rack::Timeout + Rainbows!, Puma or whatever) just for the
sake of that 1%?


More information about the mongrel-unicorn mailing list