[Mongrel-development] Mongrel for 1.9, for real?

Evan Weaver evan at cloudbur.st
Tue Jul 7 19:56:22 EDT 2009


I think we should call this version 1.2, but that's the least of our concerns.

I have a 1.2 branch in fauna but I don't know what's in it anymore...will audit.

Evan

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Weaver<evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
> http://github.com/fauna/mongrel/tree/spinoff
>
> Ragel 6.5 builds, and tests pass on 1.8 and 1.9, except for:
>
> test_deflate(HandlersTest):
> Zlib::DataError: incorrect header check
>    /Volumes/Projects/fauna/mongrel/test/test_handlers.rb:109:in
> `block in test_deflate'
>
> Which I don't understand right now.
>
> Go nuts with the packaging; I'm still not sure what you're trying to
> accomplish exactly.
>
> Evan
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Evan Weaver<evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
>>> Ugh, sorry. Mongrel is not dead, but rather severely neglected by me.
>>>
>>
>> And me. Been focusing a lot on RubyInstaller and the related tools.
>>
>>> We still use it at Twitter, for what it's worth. I will gather up the
>>> 1.9 bits I have and send you the details.
>>>
>>
>> Cool, you know my email already ;-)
>>
>>> What cross-compilation strategy did you want to use for MinGW?
>>>
>>
>> rake-compiler and fat binaries:
>>
>> http://github.com/luislavena/rake-compiler/tree/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Luis Lavena
>> AREA 17
>> -
>> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
>> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
>> Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mongrel-development mailing list
>> Mongrel-development at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Evan Weaver
>



-- 
Evan Weaver


More information about the Mongrel-development mailing list