[Mongrel-development] Mongrel for 1.9, for real?
evan at cloudbur.st
Tue Jul 7 19:56:22 EDT 2009
I think we should call this version 1.2, but that's the least of our concerns.
I have a 1.2 branch in fauna but I don't know what's in it anymore...will audit.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Weaver<evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
> Ragel 6.5 builds, and tests pass on 1.8 and 1.9, except for:
> Zlib::DataError: incorrect header check
> `block in test_deflate'
> Which I don't understand right now.
> Go nuts with the packaging; I'm still not sure what you're trying to
> accomplish exactly.
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Evan Weaver<evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
>>> Ugh, sorry. Mongrel is not dead, but rather severely neglected by me.
>> And me. Been focusing a lot on RubyInstaller and the related tools.
>>> We still use it at Twitter, for what it's worth. I will gather up the
>>> 1.9 bits I have and send you the details.
>> Cool, you know my email already ;-)
>>> What cross-compilation strategy did you want to use for MinGW?
>> rake-compiler and fat binaries:
>> Luis Lavena
>> AREA 17
>> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
>> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
>> Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
>> Mongrel-development mailing list
>> Mongrel-development at rubyforge.org
> Evan Weaver
More information about the Mongrel-development