[Mongrel-development] Mongrel for 1.9, for real?
evan at cloudbur.st
Tue Jul 7 19:51:57 EDT 2009
Ragel 6.5 builds, and tests pass on 1.8 and 1.9, except for:
Zlib::DataError: incorrect header check
`block in test_deflate'
Which I don't understand right now.
Go nuts with the packaging; I'm still not sure what you're trying to
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Luis Lavena<luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Evan Weaver<evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
>> Ugh, sorry. Mongrel is not dead, but rather severely neglected by me.
> And me. Been focusing a lot on RubyInstaller and the related tools.
>> We still use it at Twitter, for what it's worth. I will gather up the
>> 1.9 bits I have and send you the details.
> Cool, you know my email already ;-)
>> What cross-compilation strategy did you want to use for MinGW?
> rake-compiler and fat binaries:
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
> Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
> Mongrel-development mailing list
> Mongrel-development at rubyforge.org
More information about the Mongrel-development