From luislavena at gmail.com  Tue Jul  1 12:51:32 2008
From: luislavena at gmail.com (Luis Lavena)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:51:32 +0200
Subject: [Mongrel-development] Questions about state of the tree
Message-ID: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Guys,

Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.

Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
being mongrel one of these items in my list.

I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.

But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.

For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
version).

Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?

Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!

Regards,
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from
the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so.
Douglas Adams

From evan at cloudbur.st  Mon Jul 14 19:42:52 2008
From: evan at cloudbur.st (Evan Weaver)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:42:52 -0400
Subject: [Mongrel-development] Questions about state of the tree
In-Reply-To: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b6f68fc60807141642x48c1b82aw5b88e704053a98b9@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Luis,

 I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.

evan

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
> to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
>
> Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
> One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
> being mongrel one of these items in my list.
>
> I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
> regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
>
> But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
>
> For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
> and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
> version).
>
> Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
> to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
>
> Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
>
> Regards,
> --
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from
> the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
> disinclination to do so.
> Douglas Adams
> _______________________________________________
> Mongrel-development mailing list
> Mongrel-development at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
>



-- 
Evan Weaver

From normalperson at yhbt.net  Mon Jul 14 20:10:18 2008
From: normalperson at yhbt.net (Eric Wong)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:10:18 -0700
Subject: [Mongrel-development] Questions about state of the tree
In-Reply-To: <b6f68fc60807141642x48c1b82aw5b88e704053a98b9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com>
	<b6f68fc60807141642x48c1b82aw5b88e704053a98b9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080715001017.GA18127@yp-box.dyndns.org>

Evan Weaver <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
>  I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.

Actually, I was just getting around to the Ragel 6.x issues on the
internal branch I'm using at $DAY_JOB.  I'll clean those up and commit
in a bit (I've been running Ragel 5.23 + mongrel trunk in production for
a while now...)

> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Guys,
> >
> > Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
> > to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
> >
> > Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
> > One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
> > being mongrel one of these items in my list.
> >
> > I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
> > regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
> >
> > But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
> >
> > For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
> > and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
> > version).
> >
> > Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
> > to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
> >
> > Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
> >
> > Regards,

From evan at cloudbur.st  Mon Jul 14 20:32:20 2008
From: evan at cloudbur.st (Evan Weaver)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:32:20 -0400
Subject: [Mongrel-development] Questions about state of the tree
In-Reply-To: <20080715001017.GA18127@yp-box.dyndns.org>
References: <71166b3b0807010951r1f64bab0sf21d2a84548235a2@mail.gmail.com>
	<b6f68fc60807141642x48c1b82aw5b88e704053a98b9@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080715001017.GA18127@yp-box.dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <b6f68fc60807141732h4f4eff91s8f5a2b6e9062f36b@mail.gmail.com>

Please do!

Evan

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> wrote:
> Evan Weaver <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>>  I'll try to clean up 1.2 this week when I'm on vacation.
>
> Actually, I was just getting around to the Ragel 6.x issues on the
> internal branch I'm using at $DAY_JOB.  I'll clean those up and commit
> in a bit (I've been running Ragel 5.23 + mongrel trunk in production for
> a while now...)
>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Guys,
>> >
>> > Wanted a head's up on the state of 1.1 and 1.2 branches since I want
>> > to know _where_ I should add my fixes for MinGW.
>> >
>> > Right now I'm working on getting the missing pieces to provide the
>> > One-Click Installer, and checking the pieces that deserve attention,
>> > being mongrel one of these items in my list.
>> >
>> > I found that 1.1.5 slipped in with fixes but without the platform
>> > regexp fixes, that about taking MinGW as a *nix platform.
>> >
>> > But before investing time on this, want to ask you guys the following steps.
>> >
>> > For us (One-Click Installer development team), MinGW should be fixed,
>> > and we plan provide a pre-built binary for it (along current VC6
>> > version).
>> >
>> > Should I focus my current limited manpower on 1.1 for a while or try
>> > to workaround the issues lying in 1.2 branch?
>> >
>> > Thank you for your attention and everybody have a nice week!
>> >
>> > Regards,
> _______________________________________________
> Mongrel-development mailing list
> Mongrel-development at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
>



-- 
Evan Weaver

From jos at catnook.com  Tue Jul 22 12:31:04 2008
From: jos at catnook.com (Jos Backus)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:31:04 -0700
Subject: [Mongrel-development] Mongrel doesn't set close-on-exec on its
	listen socket
Message-ID: <20080722163104.GA82787@lizzy.catnook.local>

Mongrel, at least in 1.1.4, doesn't set the close-on-exec flag on the listen
socket. This leads to trouble in programs that use Mongrel and fork other
programs (like puppetmasterd, part of Puppet). For an example, see
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev/browse_thread/thread/463f0f8cfc80cc43

Please consider applying something like the following patch:

--- lib/mongrel.rb.orig 2008-07-17 17:44:42.000000000 -0400
+++ lib/mongrel.rb      2008-07-17 17:44:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -92,7 +92,9 @@

       tries = 0
       @socket = TCPServer.new(host, port)
+      @socket.fcntl(Fcntl::F_SETFD, Fcntl::FD_CLOEXEC)
+
       @classifier = URIClassifier.new
       @host = host
       @port = port

If somebody can show me what the Mongrel way of making this (POSIX)
platform-specific, that would be appreciated.

-- 
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com