[mocha-developer] Terse Mocks
dan at tastapod.com
Thu May 3 06:26:11 EDT 2007
Brian Takita wrote:
>> You can also have a "Recorder" type object that implements method_missing
>> and instance eval the block. That way, you can avoid having to pass in the
>> reference to the mock '|m|'.
Yes, you can have the object just yield to the block, but it looks less
intuitive to me, because I have to think about what the value of "self"
is for find('3') or destroy(7). The parameter makes it explicit that
it's on the mock. That's the only reason I went with one rather than the
More information about the mocha-developer