Routes

[ry dahl]

> I'm not going to merge it to trunk unless I
> think it's a big improvement and I'm not seeing why this way would be
> better.

Noted :)
New branch created at /branches/ry_routes

> I also don't like the idea of two different types of
> controllers that are exactly the same and inherit from the same
> superclass but are different only in how they are routed to.

Perhaps this distinction doesn't need to be implemented as split
classes, however I think from a user perspective it makes sense to
think of resource controllers as fundamentally different than standard
controllers - even if they share 99% of the code.


ry