[Mechanize-users] Interesting mechanize difficulty
schapht at gmail.com
Wed Sep 27 15:40:26 EDT 2006
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:43:35PM -0400, Mat Schaffer wrote:
>> On Sep 26, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:51:54PM -0400, Mat Schaffer wrote:
>>>> After looking at the code, I think a behavior decision is necesary
>>>> before a test case. I can understand the reasoning for raising an
>>>> exception, but it would be really valuable if the page were still
>>>> available from the exception. I think putting the page into the
>>>> ResponseCodeError would be a decent approach. Thoughts Aaron?
>>>> Should I make a patch to the svn trunk?
>>> You are correct. We should have access to the page after a 404 is
>>> returned. I also agree that putting the page on the exception is a
>>> If you'd like to patch it, do it against the release branch:
>>> Otherwise I will fix this error. Thank you!
>> I might have some time tomorrow and I'd like to help out. I just
>> updated to 0.6.1 via gem though, so wouldn't it be better to patch
>> against that? Or are the odds considered unstable?
> I took care of the problem, it was a pretty simple fix. If you
> need it
> right away, just check out from the release branch and run "rake
> package" to build the gem. Otherwise this will be out with 0.6.2.
Hey thanks. Sorry for being too slow on the draw, but I was bogged
down in other projects. Maybe next time.
More information about the Mechanize-users