<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2912" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=547442622-17062006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>errr....</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=547442622-17062006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=547442622-17062006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>config.<FONT
size=2>read_erb_direct_from_masterview</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=547442622-17062006>is a
pretty awful name, if ya don't mind a bit of nitpicking.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006>Maybe... 'generate_rhtml_files' or something along
those lines - want to express "should we create .rhtml output files or not" when
running in rails, right?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006>>> <FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000
size=3>default the template view src to app/views rather than
app/masterview</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=547442622-17062006>fine
by me, that's actually what I ended up deciding was the right way to organize my
own app anyway, with or w/out generated .rhtml</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=547442622-17062006>I've
been chasing odd failures related to timestamps all day... I think there's
something very odd going on related to subclipse in my Ecipse setup, but even
these end up being "my dev system" oddities it does seem to point out some
issues with changed-template checking, I have to think about what's happening a
bit more.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=547442622-17062006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=547442622-17062006>~
Deb</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> masterview-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org
[mailto:masterview-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Jeff
Barczewski<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, June 17, 2006 3:00 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
masterview-devel@rubyforge.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Masterview-devel] Finished
direct to erb<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>I finished the direct to erb functionality and added ability to
configure it on or off. <BR><BR>Should I default it to on? If so should we
default the template view src to app/views rather than app/masterview?<BR><BR>I
still need to test this stuff on windows, but it is working on *nix.
<BR><BR>Jeff<BR></BODY></HTML>