[libxml-devel] Odd attribute semantics
transfire at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 10:28:03 EDT 2007
On 3/18/07, Marc Munro <marc at bloodnok.com> wrote:
> Yes I do know C. I don't know the libraries that this all of this based
> on though, and don't really have the time available right now to work on
> it. My free-time is going on an as yet unpublished free-software
> project which I want to concentrate on for now.
> I don't actually need a fix for my project as I have found work-arounds.
> Actually I found this mostly as the result of some bad practice on my
> part, so I'm not sure its a bug so much as an undocumented feature. For
> me, it would have been enough to have better documentation. It does
> seem though that the attribute methods could use some general attention.
> Far more significant in my view are bugs 9134 and 9135
Shoot. I was hopeful. I'm not a C coder myself, but libxml is a very
important library to me. Ross has brought the bindings along nicely,
but he seems to be pretty busy. I hardly even seem him on the mailing
list these days. I just wish we could get some of these bugs fixed.
I'm even wondering is bounties would help.
More information about the libxml-devel