From t_leitner at gmx.at  Wed Jun  1 05:07:02 2011
From: t_leitner at gmx.at (Thomas Leitner)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:07:02 +0200
Subject: [kramdown-users] Attribute list definitions for code blocks
In-Reply-To: <1306886723-sup-1321@samurai.icir.org>
References: <1306886723-sup-1321@samurai.icir.org>
Message-ID: <20110601110702.18f9ddd7@noeato>

On 2011-05-31 17:10 -0700 Matthias Vallentin wrote:
> How can I push the class attribute into the code tag, rather than
> applying to the outside pre tag? That is, I would like to generate the
> following:
> 
>     <pre><code class="language-foo">
>     some code
>     </code></pre> 
> 
> Any ideas on how to achieve this?

This is only possible by subclassing the HTML converter (at
lib/kramdown/converter/html.rb) and overriding the #convert_codeblock
method.

-- Thomas

From vallentin at icir.org  Fri Jun 10 14:25:04 2011
From: vallentin at icir.org (Matthias Vallentin)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:25:04 -0700
Subject: [kramdown-users] Lists and math
Message-ID: <1307729974-sup-3478@samurai.icir.org>

This following piece of kramdown code

    - Vector $$V$$ of $$m$$ cells, i.e., $$m = |V|$$

is compiled into a table due to the pipe symbols:

  <li> 
    <table> 
      <tbody> 
        <tr> 
          <td>Vector <script type="math/tex">V</script> of <script type="math/tex">m</script> cells, i.e., $$m =</td> 
          <td>V</td> 
          <td>$$</td> 
        </tr> 
      </tbody> 
    </table> 
  </li> 

While I do want the <li> wrapping, the table generation appears to be
bug. I am using kramdown 0.13.3.

    Matthias

From vallentin at icir.org  Fri Jun 10 16:47:15 2011
From: vallentin at icir.org (Matthias Vallentin)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:47:15 -0700
Subject: [kramdown-users] Escaping in math
Message-ID: <1307738438-sup-9553@samurai.icir.org>

Consider this code snippet:

    \$$S = \{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$$ where $$x_i\in U$$ and $$|S| = n$$

It will only compile correctly if I escape the backslash of the curly
braces inside the first math block; like this:

    \$$S = \\{x_1,\dots,x_n\\}$$ where $$x_i\in U$$ and $$|S| = n$$

That is, it is necessary to change \{ to \\{. Is this intended behavior?
Intuitively, I assumed that everything inside the two dollar signs
should be compilable TeX. Or do I need to consider some extra escaping
rules?

    Matthias

From vallentin at icir.org  Fri Jun 10 17:02:53 2011
From: vallentin at icir.org (Matthias Vallentin)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:02:53 -0700
Subject: [kramdown-users] Escaping in math
In-Reply-To: <1307738438-sup-9553@samurai.icir.org>
References: <1307738438-sup-9553@samurai.icir.org>
Message-ID: <1307739420-sup-3522@samurai.icir.org>

> That is, it is necessary to change \{ to \\{. Is this intended behavior?

Please discard my mail regarding this concern. I figured out that the
issue I am having is an artifact of the earlier problem with respect to
the table generation. Removing the pipes around |S| in  

>     \$$S = \{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$$ where $$x_i\in U$$ and $$|S| = n$$

solves the escaping problem. Sorry about the noise,

    Matthias