[kramdown-users] 0.11 bug (feature?) with <pre>-in-<dd> parsing
t_leitner at gmx.at
Tue Nov 2 15:28:32 EDT 2010
On 2010-11-02 23:49 +0700 Shawn Van Ittersum wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:34:41 -0700, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:36 AM, Thomas Leitner wrote:
> >> On 2010-11-01 08:34 -0700 Matt Neuburg wrote:
> >>> Ideally, I suppose, the same fix in 0.12 that ignores pipes in
> >>> <code> tags should also be ignoring pipes in <pre> tags. m.
> >> The fix in 0.12.0 only applies to kramdown's syntax for code
> >> spans, not HTML `<code>` elements!
> > No, and saying markdown="0" in the <code> tag doesn't help, either.
> > This thing with the pipes has really just come charging in and
> > slashed through what I thought were the basic rules of kramdown...
> > m.
> Agreed. I wonder if it's really worth all the trouble and unexpected
> consequences to support the PHP Markdown Extra syntax of optional
> leading pipe for table rows. Based on their own flawed
> implementation, perhaps they didn't really think this through, and
> it's not a good syntax for kramdown to copy.
As said in the response to the parent post, the problem is *not* a
consequence of the syntax change, it is only more visible now.
More information about the kramdown-users