[kramdown-users] using kramdown in xhtml
Shawn Van Ittersum
svicalifornia at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 04:52:30 EDT 2010
I prefer named entities for readability. Could there be an option to
[sent from mobile phone]
On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Thomas Leitner <t_leitner at gmx.at> wrote:
> On 2010-06-08 13:02 -0700 Matt Neuburg wrote:
>>> On 6/8/10 10:31 AM, john muhl wrote:
>>>> is it possible to use kramdown in an xhtml document? or someway to
>>>> say you want numeric entities instead of named entities; e.g.
>>>> `“` instead of `“`?
>> I agree that this option sounds desirable. I generally prefer numeric
>> to named entities.
>> Just to be clear, though, named entities are legal in XHTML. So this
>> would be purely an XML matter. Also, the usual approach in a feed is
>> to enclose everything that might be (X)HTML in <![CDATA[...]]>
> Is there any advantage in using named entities besides being better
> understandable? I don't have a preference regarding named or numeric
> entities, so if numeric entities are preferred, I will modfiy the HTML
> parser to emit numeric entities.
> -- Thomas
> kramdown-users mailing list
> kramdown-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the kramdown-users