[kramdown-users] is this rule necessary?
Shawn Van Ittersum
svicalifornia at gmail.com
Thu Aug 5 15:09:43 EDT 2010
I agree with Matt on this. [..](<..>) seems unnecessarily complicated.
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:52:41 -0700, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> This is not a huge deal, so ignore if it's too much trouble.
> There's a rule in kramdown that didn't exist in Markdown: if you have this
> structure (inline link):
> ...then if the link has any spaces in it, you have to surround it with angle
> Otherwise the structure is not transformed to an anchor tag.
> Now, this is a perfectly clear rule, so there's no bug or anything. The
> issue for me is purely a matter of convience: I have a LOT of these, and
> transforming them all (inserting the angle brackets), as I turn my Markdown
> Web sites into kramdown sites, is a pain in the butt. Which leads to me to
> ask: is this rule necessary? Why can't we just assume that [...](...) is
> this structure, and needs transforming, the same as Markdown did, regardless
> of whether the parentheses contains spaces?
> matt neuburg, phd = matt at tidbits.com, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/
> pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei
> Among the 2007 MacTech Top 25, http://tinyurl.com/2rh4pf
> AppleScript: the Definitive Guide, 2nd edition
> Take Control of Exploring & Customizing Snow Leopard
> RubyFrontier! http://www.apeth.com/RubyFrontierDocs/default.html
> TidBITS, Mac news and reviews since 1990, http://www.tidbits.com
> kramdown-users mailing list
> kramdown-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the kramdown-users