[kramdown-users] Inline comments

Michael Franzl michaelfranzl at gmx.at
Mon Apr 12 16:17:50 EDT 2010

Thomas Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:31:45 +1000, Shawn Van Ittersum wrote:
>> Well, I can still see that being a source of great confusion, even
>> more so when the tags are wrapped around a block.  I would at least
>> like kramdown to support an alternate close-tag syntax, so I can make
>> sure that my documents can use distinctive close tags.  Having to
>> track whether each {::nomarkdown:} or other state-toggle tag is
>> opening or closing in a long document could be a major pain.
> You are correct in this regard, there should probably be a difference
> between the start and end tag of an extension block. What about having
> `{::comment:}` as start and `{::}` as end tag? This should be no
> problem *except* when one wants to nest extension tags which is also
> not supported currently (and therefore no problem). This approach would
> also be less verbose.

What about an short alias:

   Something is {::c:}hidden{::} in here.


More information about the kramdown-users mailing list