[kramdown-users] Inline comments

[Shawn Van Ittersum]

Those won't work because kramdown text may contain bits of other languages where those parentheses or hash marks must be preserved, not interpreted by kramdown.

Again, I advocate a single consistent syntax for kramdown directives, which is currently:  {: ... }

With that in mind, I suggest:

   {:comment} skip this {:/comment}

or alternatively:

   There is something {:comment: skip this } hidden in this sentence.

Shawn

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:48:28 +0200, Michael Franzl wrote:
> Thomas Leitner wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to implement inline comments, like in this ERB 
>>> example:
>>> 
>>>      This text is completely <%# find better word %> ignored by
>> 
>> Yeah, it would be nice to have an inline syntax for extensions like
>> `comment`. However, I don't think that the block syntax for extensions
>> should be used inline because of its verbosity. Any suggestions?
> 
> What about
> 
>    This is a ((comment))
> 
> or
> 
>    This is a #comment#
> 
> Michael
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kramdown-users mailing list
> kramdown-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/kramdown-users