<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jim Deville <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jdeville@microsoft.com">jdeville@microsoft.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">I honestly don’t think that shipping a 1.0 will delay any future release by much. I also don’t think that a Rails 3 release would hurt the progress towards 1.9. Unless something major changes, I believe all of the 1.8.7 features we are currently lacking for Rails 3 are also 1.9 features.</span></p>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Then that sounds like a great idea then :-) </div><div>Personally I won't be running rails3 on IronRuby (due to the fact that I'm not working on any webapps at all), but I would like to see rails3 support being not too far behind the release of rails3 itself. </div>
<div>Rails is the main drawcard for ruby, and I believe IronRuby would lose credibility by not being able to run rails 3 (even though nobody may actually run it anyway) </div></div>