Basecamp does not change your experience a lot comparing to rubyforge. I think Groove would give you better ability in terms of collaborative documentation exchange. I know there is one more product created by the big search engine guy for collaborative documentation, but calling this out might seriously making our MS friends unhappy :)
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/4/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Phil Haack</b> <<a href="mailto:haacked@gmail.com">haacked@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Ah, thanks for the clarification!<br><br>Well for any artifacts such as design docs, I'd love to see them in the SVN repository since they should be versioned anyways.<br><br>As for actual real-time meetings, I've always liked Skype, but there's a limit in the # of users in a conf call. Live Meeting ought to work for that, though it's a pain to set up properly.
<br><br>Anyone play around with BaseCamp for this sort of thing?<br><br>Phil<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org">ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org</a> [mailto:
<a href="mailto:ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org">ironruby-core-bounces@rubyforge.org</a>] On Behalf Of M. David Peterson<br>Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:29 AM<br>To: <a href="mailto:ironruby-core@rubyforge.org">
ironruby-core@rubyforge.org</a><br>Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby community and communications<br><br>On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:03:28 -0600, Phil Haack <<a href="mailto:haacked@gmail.com">haacked@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
<br><br>> Forgive me if this seems like a naïve question, but since the project is<br>> hosted on RubyForge, why not use its facilities to run the project. Is<br>> it not up to snuff?<br><br>This conversation stems mostly from the "How can external folks get
<br>involved with participating in meetings and collaborating on design<br>docs?". RubyForge is fine for the standard bug tracking, doc<br>developement, etc, but as far as I know there are no tools in place to<br>allow for any type of decentralized communication and collaboration type
<br>features.<br><br>--<br>/M:D<br><br>M. David Peterson<br><a href="http://mdavid.name">http://mdavid.name</a> | <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354</a> |<br><a href="http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155">
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Ironruby-core mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org">Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org</a><br><a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core">
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Ironruby-core mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org">Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org</a><br>
<a href="http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core">http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core</a><br></blockquote></div><br>