jbevain at gmail.com
Mon Oct 25 16:02:42 EDT 2010
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tomas Matousek
<Tomas.Matousek at microsoft.com> wrote:
> 2) It might be possible to split the repo to 3 parts – IronRuby
> specific, IronPython specific, and DLR, make a submodule for each and
> combine those submodules into “DynamicLanguages” repo. So what’s exactly the
> effective difference among the repo built this way and 1)?
The difference is that it then becomes easier for people that are only
interested in either IronPython or IronRuby to track commits. There
will be a timeline for each modules. And you get to follow the ones
you're interested in. And if you're only interested in one, your
timeline isn't «polluted» with comments or commits from the others.
More information about the Ironruby-core