[Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Shri.Borde at microsoft.com
Fri Mar 12 12:57:15 EST 2010
Sounds great. Thanks for pushing on this!
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Updated my patch to Ruby Gems to match on "universal-dotnetX.X", where X.X is the version number.
This will allow for the creation of .NET-specific gems with names like:
If there are no objections, I'll resubmit to Ruby Gems.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero <ivan at whiterabbitconsulting.eu<mailto:ivan at whiterabbitconsulting.eu>> wrote:
I don't care either way as long as it's lower-case
On Thursday, March 11, 2010, Orion Edwards <orion.edwards at gmail.com<mailto:orion.edwards at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so "gemname-universal-dotNET" would read better than just "gemname-universal-dotnet".
> dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for terrible marketing and terrible naming, so I'd argue that "use the correct spelling" is an anti-feature :-)
> Personally, I like Tomas' suggestion of clr
> gemname-universal-clr2.0 looks very nice :-)
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero - Mob: +32.486.787.582
Web: http://whiterabbitconsulting.eu - http://flanders.co.nz
Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
Microsoft IronRuby/C# MVP
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core