[Ironruby-core] Did Something Changed Again in Spec...
Ivan Porto Carrero
ivan at flanders.co.nz
Tue Jan 26 04:07:34 EST 2010
How does implementing FFI provide code coverage for the CLR, isn't that
mutually exclusive? Shouldn't FFI provide us with a way to use C-based
extensions? But C-based extensions won't know about the ironruby internals
etc. Just thinking out loud so feel free to correct me :)
Also aren't the stacks produced by IronRuby a little different from the
stacks produced by MRI for example.
To get code coverage for the CLR is that again the CLR profiling API you
would leverage? could somebody point me in the right direction?
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ryan Riley <ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>wrote:
> I asked about that earlier, as well, and got the response that it is not
> covered. I believe one of the goals post-1.0 is to get Ruby FFI working. If
> you'd like to see RCov working, you might write a patch to move RCov to Ruby
> FFI so that it will work on IronRuby once FFI support is working. And if you
> get that done, you might even be able to pitch in with the FFI
> implementation. I, for one, would appreciate it. :) Of course, I could do
> those, too, but I'm working on a few other things, atm. :)
> Ryan Riley
> Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley
> Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/
> Twitter: @panesofglass
> Website: http://panesofglass.org/
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mohammad Azam <lists at ruby-forum.com>wrote:
>> I was trying to make ironruby to perform code coverage for a .NET
>> assembly using rcov but it seems like it is not currently supported
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core