[Ironruby-core] A nicer syntax for generic extension methods
Tomas.Matousek at microsoft.com
Tue Feb 2 02:36:28 EST 2010
Actually, you can add Ruby methods to List<T> ... IronRuby type system does some magic for you :):
>>> include System::Collections::Generic
=> [System::Collections::Generic::List[T], System::Collections::Generic::IList[Fixnum], System::Collections::Generic::IList[T], System::Collections::Generic::ICollection[Fixnum], System::Collections::Generic::ICollection[T], System::Collections::Generic::IEnumerable[Fixnum], System::Collections::Generic::IEnumerable[T], System::Collections::IEnumerable, Enumerable, System::Collections::IList, System::Collections::ICollection, System::Collections::Generic, Kernel]
As you can see the List<> generic type definition is treated as a module that is mixed in each of its instantiations. Although there are no predefined methods on it you can open it and add some. First we need to get Ruby class for List<T>. If you index System.Collections.Generic.List by a fixnum instead of a class/module you'll get the generic definition of arity 1. Let's name it ListOfT:
>>> ListOfT = List
And then we can open it up:
>>> module ListOfT
... def size
>>> l = List[Fixnum].new
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:31 PM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] A nicer syntax for generic extension methods
IIRC you can open "concrete" generics, but not "open" ones: In plain english this means you can add methods to List<string> but not List<T>.
This is essentially because List<T> isn't a real type in the CLR, it's basically some metadata that can be used to build a real type when the T is supplied.
You could as an alternative add methods to the underlying non-generic IEnumerable interface, but then you'd have to do some run-time reflection to figure out that your List is actually a List<string>... This is probably not nice.
In theory when CLR4 lands and has support for co/contra variant generics, List<object> should match List<string> and everything else, but I don't know if IronRuby would also work for this?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Ryan Riley <ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>> wrote:
I have been trying to figure out how to Rubify generic extension methods for use with the likes of Rx, Open XML SDK, etc. Ivan went over it a bit with me this weekend, but I'm still having difficulty including a module within a .NET type. Is that even possible?
The questions I'm not able to answer are:
1. Can I somehow open up a .NET class, say System::Collections::Generic::List[T] and include the EnumerableExtensions? So far, I'm finding that's a no.
2. How do I hook in the included(base) method above? I'm assuming that's a one-time call, but I don't see anywhere that it's called when a module is included. Do I need to use a before_filter or perform that action at the beginning of the linq_select method?
Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core