[Ironruby-core] RubyGems/RDoc 1.8.6 policy

Zac Brown zac at zacbrown.org
Sat Apr 24 16:28:11 EDT 2010


Yup, thats what it appears. I'm willing to work on either, just depends 
on what people's needs are. I personally would be prefer just pushing 
forward with 1.9 support but I don't know the state of 1.9 vs 1.8.7 support.

-Zac

On 4/24/2010 12:57 PM, Will Green wrote:
> Looks like we'll need an IronRuby 1.0.1 that brings us up to 1.8.7. 
> Unless we can get to 1.9 faster...
>
> --
> Will Green
> http://hotgazpacho.org/
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Zac Brown <zac at zacbrown.org 
> <mailto:zac at zacbrown.org>> wrote:
>
>     Saw this earlier today, might be something to think about in the
>     near future for IronRuby and compatibility.
>
>     http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2010/04/23/ruby-1-8-6-policy
>
>     -Zac
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ironruby-core mailing list
>     Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org <mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
>     http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>    



More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list